Teacher

TEACHERperspective

The teacher perspective asks you to consider your practice from the educator's point of view. It includes the development of teachers for eLearning, their different roles in the process and the evaluation of practice.

The planning, design and preparation of eLearning and assessment materials for delivery to a set of learners. It considers collaborative design, teaching, learner skills, needs and support.

eLearning guidelines:

TD 1: Is the use of eLearning the most appropriate way to achieve the intended learning outcomes?

TD 2: Is consideration given to ways in which face-to-face opportunities may complement eLearning and eTeaching?

TD 3:How can library staff support access to relevant digital resources for the programme?

TD 4: Are eLearning materials within the boundaries of copyright and digital licensing agreements?

TD 5: Are staff development personnel involved in the introduction of new approaches, tools and materials?

TD 6: Is there a high level of interaction designed for, structured and supported?

TD 7: Have minimum standards for eLearning engagement and interaction been agreed upon for teachers and learners?

TD 8: Are online assessment practices safe, secure, fair reliable and valid?

TD 9: Do the assessments reflect learners' content knowledge and practice separate from their digital skill level?

TD 10: Is technology an enabler rather than a barrier to learners in assessment situations?

TD 11: Will students receive guidance on study skills for the eLearning environment?

TD 12: Are staff adequately supported and professionally developed to learn about and use required learning technologies and online resources?

TD 13: Do teaching staff engage in an online teaching orientation programme?

To support the effective delivery of eTeaching and eLearning. It considers teaching, collaboration, professional development and technical aspects.

eLearning guidelines:

TI 1: Do teaching staff introduce and support the development of digital information and technical skills relevant to their course?

TI 2: Do teaching staff provide advice to learners on online etiquette, including effective and ethical communication techniques for online discussions and email?

TI 3:Are guidelines in place for teachers about establishing virtual professional relationships with learners?

TI 4: Are teachers able to monitor online course activity to consider areas needing additional teaching support?

TI 5: Is learner online engagement monitored?

TI 6: Do the activities support the development of a learning community?

TI 7: Can learners practise using the required online assessment tools they need for submitting assessments?

TI 8: Are assessments designed to lessen the opportunity for plagiarism?

TI 9: Are learners required to digitally declare their work is their own?

TI 10: Has there been consideration of the use of digital tools to detect plagiarism?

The forward planning for ongoing improvement and sustainability of eLearning. It considers ongoing professional development and the gathering and use of evidence for continued improvement and effectiveness.

eLearning guidelines:

TE 1: Is learning design informed by recent research on effective eLearning?

TE 2: Are innovations in eLearning supported by staff developers and other staff?

TE 3: Do teaching staff maintain and improve their digital information literacy skills?

TE 4: Are learning analytics collected to inform teaching and learning decisions?

TE 5: Do evaluations on why learners did not complete the course include review of the digital elements?

TE 6: Is learner feedback reviewed and considered for enhancements?

Abdelmalak, M. (2015). Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities: Students’ perspectives. Online Learning, 19(2). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=online+learning+student+perspective&pr=on&ft=on&id=EJ1062942
Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L. &Bennett, S. (2018). Identifying the characteristics of support Australian university teachers use in their design work: Implications for the learning design field. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 1- 15. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3776/1529
Aleksic-Maslac, K., & Magzan, M. (2011). ICT as a tool for building social capital in higher education. Online Submission. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531893.pdf
Al-Khatib, H. (2011). Technology enhanced learning: virtual realities; concrete results - case study on the impact of TEL on learning. European Journal of Open, Distance And E-Learning, (1). Retrieved from http://iisit.org/Vol7/IISITv7p519-529Tucker759.pdf
Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2009). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1-19. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e23a/313b71290adce7bb54902f9c27df19af78...
Anstey, L. & Watson, P. (2018). Rubric for eLearning Tool Evaluation. Centre for Teaching and Learning, Western University. Retrieved from https://teaching.uwo.ca/pdf/elearning/Rubric-for-eLearning-Tool-Evaluati...
Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 10(3), 222-226. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v10i3/10325.pdf
Arnone, M. P., Small, R. V., Chauncey, S. A., & McKenna, H. (2011). Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: A new research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 181-198. Retrieved from http://www.marilynarnone.com/data/ETRDfulltext.pdf
Attwell, G., & Hughes, J. (2010). Pedagogic approaches to using technology for learning - literature review. Lifelong Learning UK. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4152236.pdf
Bai, X., & Smith, M. B. (2010). Promoting hybrid learning through a sharable eLearning approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,14(3), 13-24. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ909880.pdf
Banerjee, G. (2011). Blended environments: Learning effectiveness and student satisfaction at a small college in transition. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 8-19. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918215.pdf
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010). Indicators of engagement. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic,& S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings asciliteSydney 2010 (pp.75-86). Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org/conferences/sydney10/procs/Beer-full.pdf
Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ920745.pdf
Bentley, Y., Selassie, H., & Shegunshi, A. (2012). Design and evaluation of student-focused eLearning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(1), 1-12. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ969431.pdf
Borovik, A. (2011). Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: A mathematician’s point of view. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 73-85. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09687769.2010.548504
Burgess, M., & Caverly, D. C. (2010). Techtalk: An online framework for developmental literacy. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(1), 38-39. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ942883.pdf
Buus, L. (2012). Scaffolding teachers integrate social media into a problem-based learning approach? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(1), 13-22. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ969432.pdf
Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Romo, J., & Benito, M. (2010). Strategy approach for eLearning 2.0 deployment in universities. Digital Education Review, (18), 1-8. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/39131105.pdf
Cho, M., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 123 – 140. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=online+learning+student&pr=on&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_2014&pg=3&id=EJ1093637
Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(2), 133-148. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09687769.2010.494718
Costa, C., Murphy, M., Lucia Pereira, A. &Taylor, Y. (2018). Higher education students’ experiences of digital learning and (dis)empowerment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 140 – 152. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3979/1534
Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2016). The relationship between social presence and critical thinking: Results from learner discourse in an asynchronous learning environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 89-108. doi:10.28945/3418. Retrieved from http://jite.org/documents/Vol15/JITEv15ResearchP089-108Costley1738.pdf
Crichton, S., Pegler, K., & White, D. (2012). Personal devices in public settings: lessons learned from an iPod Touch/iPad project. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(1), 23-31. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ969433.pdf
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32. Retrieved from http://edtc6325teamone2ndlife.pbworks.com/f/6325%2BLearning%2Baffordances%2Bof%2B3-D.pdf
Diaz, V. (2011). Cloud-based technologies: faculty development, support, and implementation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 95-102. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918223.pdf
Dringus, L. P. (2012). Learning analytics considered harmful. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 87-100. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982677.pdf
Edwards, S., & Bone, J. (2012). Integrating peer assisted learning and eLearning: using innovative pedagogies to support learning and teaching in higher education settings.Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 1-12. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=...
Esposito, A. (2012). Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC.Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(3), 315-325. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ985433.pdf
Everett, D. R. (2015). Adding value: Online student engagement. Information Systems Education Journal, 13(6), 68 – 76. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=online+learning+student&pr=on&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_2014&id=EJ1137356
Ferrell, G., Smith, R. & Knight, S. (2018). Designing learning and assessment in a digital age. JISC. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/designing-learning-and-assessment-in-a-dig...
Forbes, D. L., & Gedera, D. S. P. (2019). From confounded to common ground: Misunderstandings between tertiary teachers and students in online discussions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 1-13. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3595/1561
Gedera, D. (2014). Students’ experiences of learning in a virtual classroom. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(4), 93 – 101. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=online+learning+student&pr=on&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_2014&pg=3&id=EJ1059024
Gomez-Rey, P., Barbera, E & Fernandez-Navaro, F. (2018). Students’ perceptions about online teaching effectiveness: A bottom-up approach for identifying instructors’ roles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 116 – 130. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3437/1521
González, C. (2010). University teachers’ experiences of teaching in blended learning environments. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2123/6401
Grant, M. (2012). University of Missouri-St. Louis: data-driven online course design and effective practices. Continuing Higher Education Review, 76, 183-192. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1000665.pdf
Gray, J. & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=online+learning+student&pr=on&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_2014&pg=2&id=EJ1103654
Guiney, P. (2012).Learners’ participation, retention and success in e-learning: An annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ict/learners-participation,-retention-and-success-in-e-learning-an-annotated-bibliography
Hall, A., & Herrington, J. (2010). The development of social presence in online Arabic learning communities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 1012-1027. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1031. Retrieved from http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/3753/
Hobbs, R., Ranieri, M., Markus, S., Fortuna, C., Zamora, M. & Coiro, J. (2017). Digital Literacy in Higher Education: A Report. Providence, RI: Media Education Lab. Retrieved from https://mediaeducationlab.com/sites/default/files/Digital%20Literacy%20i...
Hoon, T. S., Chong, T. S., & Binti Ngah, N. A. (2010). Effect of an interactive courseware in the learning of matrices. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 121-132. Retrieved from https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/13_1/ets_13_1.pdf#page=126
Hsu, Y. C., & Ching, Y. H. (2012). Mobile microblogging: using Twitter and mobile devices in an online course to promote learning in authentic contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 211-227. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001713.pdf
Hwang, I., Tam, M., Lam, S., & Lam, P. (2012). Review of use of animation as a supplementary learning material of physiology content in four academic years. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(4), 368-377. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ986645.pdf
International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS). (2012, October 19-21). Proceedings of the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA). Madrid,Spain: International Association for Development of the Information Society. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542606.pdf
Jamieson-Proctor, R., Albion, P., & Larkin, K. (2013). Distance learning at times and places chosen by the learner: adapting resources and learning behaviours for working with mobile digital devices. dehub Report Series 2013. Armidale NSW, Australia: University of New England, dehub. Retrieved from https://eprints.usq.edu.au/23868/1/USQ_DEHub%20Report_2013.pdf
Jeffrey, L., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2012). Strategies for engaging learners in a blended environment. Ako Aotearoa - The National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence. Retrieved from https://ako.ac.nz/knowledge-centre/blended-learning/help-or-hindrance-bl...
Joint Information Systems Committee. (2009).Effective assessment in a digital age - a guide to technology enhanced assessment feedback. Retrieved from https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/digiassass_eada.pdf
Ke, F., & C. Hoadley. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 487–510. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9120-2. Retrieved from https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/scmsAdmin/uploads/004/299/fulltext.pdf
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ973806.pdf
Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting a blended learning approach: challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 45-57. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918218.pdf
Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2015). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(2), 107 – 115. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=online+learning+student+perspective&pr=on&ft=on&id=EJ1141876
Khoo, E., & Forret, M. (2015). Evaluating an online learning community: Intellectual, social and emotional development and transformations. Waikato Journal of Education, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v16i1.75. Retrieved from http://www.wje.org.nz/index.php/WJE/article/view/236
Kim, K., & Frick, T. W. (2011). Changes in student motivation during online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1-23. Retrieved from http://www.anitacrawley.net/Resources/Articles/Kim2011%20changes%20in%20...
Koloto, A. (2006) Critical success factors for effective use of elearning with Pacific leaners. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/e-Learning/critical-suc...
Lee, R., & Dashew, B. (2011). Designed learner interactions in blended course delivery. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 68-76. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918220.pdf
Levinsen, K. (2011). Fluidity in the networked society - self-initiated learning as a digital literacy competence. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 9(1), 52-62. Retrieved from https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/36461287/ejel_volume9_issue1_article167_1_.pdf
Lynch, K., Barr, N., & Oprescu, F. (2012). Learning paramedic science skills from a first person point of view. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(4), 396-406. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ986672.pdf
Mark, K. P., Thadani, D. R., Santandreu Calonge, D., Pun, C. F., & Chiu, P. H. (2011). From neophyte to experienced facilitator: An interactive blended-learning course for graduate teaching assistants in Hong Kong. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL),3(2), 153-169. Retrieved from http://kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/viewFil...
Mercer, E., Parol, S., Peters, S., & Putzke, H. (2013). Awareness and education of e-learning at the polytechnic of Namibia. Retrieved from https://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-051013-120944/unrestricted/CTL_Final_IQP_Report.pdf
Murray, M., Perez, J., Geist, D., & Hedrick, A. (2012). Student interaction with online course content: build it and they might come. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 125-140. Retrieved from http://jite.org/documents/Vol11/JITEv11p125-140Murray1095.pdf
Muuro, M. E., Wagacha, P. W., Kihoro, J., & Oboko, R. (2014). Students’ perceived challenges in an online collaborative learning environment: A case of higher learning institutions in Nairobi, Kenya. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1768
Nakabayashi, K., Morimoto, Y., & Hada, Y. (2010). Design and implementation of an extensible learner-adaptive environment.Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 2(3), 246-259. Retrieved from http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/vie...
Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Harland, J., & Warburton, G. (2011). How active are students in online discussion forums?Paper presented at Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2011), Perth Australia January 2011. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4577/bde7527572e382ec0ff65bad9151f002f3...
Nie, M., Armellini, A., Witthaus, G., & Barklamb, K. (2011). How do e-book readers enhance learning opportunities for distance work-based learners? Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 19-38. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09687769.2010.548506
Norton, G., Taylor, M., Stewart, T., Blackburn, G., Jinks, A.,& Razdar, B. (2012). Designing, developing and implementing a software tool for scenario based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1083-1102. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4518/2e4e2123da48a3564555cf8ce810c35a91...
Olesova, L., Yang, D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Cross-cultural differences in undergraduate students’ perceptions of online barriers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(3), 68-80. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ935586.pdf
Pan, N., Lau, H., & Lai, W. (2010). Sharing e-Learning innovation across disciplines: an encounter between engineering and teacher education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8(1), 31-40. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ880097.pdf
Parisio, M. L. (2010). University teachers’ conceptions of learning through online discussion. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2123/7023
Peacock, S., & Cowan, J. (2016). From presences to linked influences within communities of inquiry. International Review of Research In Open & Distance Learning, 17(5), 267-283. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2602
Picciano, A. G. (2012). The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 9-20. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982669.pdf
RacoonGang.com (2018). Creating online courses: A step by step guide. Retrieved from https://raccoongang.com/blog/creating-online-courses-step-step-guide/
Richardson, J., Koehler, A., Besser, E., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2123
Rossi, D., Beer, C., Janse van Rensburg, H. M., Harreveld, R. E., Danaher, P. A., & Singh, M. J. G. (2011).Learning interactions: A crossinstitutional multi-disciplinary analysis of learner-learner and learner-teacher and learner-content interactions in online learning contexts. Report Series 2013. Armidale, NSW, Australia: University of New England, dehub. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fa6e/a478ce159c2752e8c1ace15903be470c2b... 646198101.1563492937
Ryman, S., Burrell, L., Hardham, G., Richardson, B., & Ross, J. (2010). Creating and sustaining online learning communities: Designing for transformative learning. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(3), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.5.3.32. Retrieved from http://anitacrawley.net/Resources/Articles/Ryman2009learning%20communiti...
Schwartz, M. (2018). Engaging adult learners. Ryerson University. Retrieved from https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/lt/resources/handouts/EngagingAdultLe...
Shah, U., Hodgson, V., & Trehan, K. (2012).Teachers’ experiences of using learning technology in Pakistan. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2012/abstracts/pdf/shah.pdf
Shelton, S. (2018). “You have to teach to your personality”: Caring, sharing and teaching with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 92- 106. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3557/1501
Starcic, A. (2010). Educational technology for the inclusive classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 9(3), 26-37. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v9i3/933.pdf
Stary, C., & Weichhart, G. (2012). An eLearning approach to informed problem solving. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 4(2), 195-216. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.705.49&rep=rep1...
Stebbings, S., Bagheri, N., Perrie, K., Blyth, P., & McDonald, J. (2012). Blended learning and curriculum renewal across three medical schools: the rheumatology module at the University of Otago. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1176-1189. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/viewFile/795/95
Su, K. (2011). An intensive ICT-integrated environmental learning strategy for enhancing student performance. International Journal of Environmental And Science Education, 6(1), 39-58. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ930277.pdf
Suki, N., & Suki, N. (2011). Using mobile device for learning: from students’ perspective.Online Submission. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522204.pdf
Swann, J., & Albion, P. (2013). Caring dialogue: A step toward realising the dream of online learning communities. In H. Carter, M. Gosper & J. Hedberg (Eds.), Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney(pp. 854-864). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171222/
Tsai, F.H. (2013). The development and evaluation of an online formative assessment upon single-player game in e-learning environment. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(2). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1157774.pdf
Tu, C. H., Sujo-Montes, L., Yen, C. J., Chan, J. Y., & Blocher, M. (2012). The integration of personal learning environments & open network learning environments. Techtrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 56(3), 13-19. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257692991_The_Integration_of_Personal.... ...
Vail, H. (2018). Examining the need for culturally responsive digital learning. Waikato Journal of Education, 23(2), 17-23. Retrieved from https://wje.org.nz/index.php/WJE/article/view/652/619
Valk, J., Rashid, A. T., & Elder, L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes: an analysis of evidence from Asia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 117-140. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ881581.pdf
Veletsianos, G. (Ed.). (2010). Emerging technologies in distance education. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120177
Vom Brocke, C.( 2011). How to leverage virtual learning communities for teaching agile communication skills? The egroups case at the University of Münster in Germany and Massey University in New Zealand. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 3(4), 644 - 664.Retrieved from http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/vie...
Xial, C., Fielder, J., & Siragusa, L. (2013). Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 97-113. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier23/xia.pdf
Yu, P., Liao, Y., Su, M., Cheng, P., & Pai, C. (2012). A rapid auto-indexing technology for designing readable e-Learning content. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(5), 20-38. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001720.pdf

Guidelines

Download the complete list of eLearning guidelines and references for the teacher perspective.

Workbook

Download the Teacher Perspective Workbook to support your engagement with the eLearning guidelines.